20 Apr 2024 6:41 am
Cannibalism was practised by some communities in the past in specific contexts, said Kabuni, such as eating a deceased relative out of respect, to prevent their body from decomposing. “There was context. They wouldn’t just eat any white men that fell from the sky,” said Kabuni.Beekeeper » 18 Apr 2024, 5:02 am » wrote: ↑ So, ASSWIPES, when are you LOSERS going to start calling out your boy bye-DUMB for his MASSIVE LIES??? Every. ****. Day.
Uncle Bosie eaten by cannibals??? No really, your boy said that. His MIND has been turned into a rotten melon.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... new-guinea
It was originally reported that Rockefeller either drowned or was attacked by an animal, such as a shark or saltwater crocodile. However, because headhunting and cannibalism were still present in some areas of Asmat in 1961, there has also been speculation that Rockefeller may have been killed and eaten by tribespeople from the Asmat village of Otsjanep.[9]
In 1969, journalist Milt Machlin traveled to the island to investigate Rockefeller's disappearance. He dismissed reports of Rockefeller living as a captive or as a Kurtz-like figure in the jungle, but concluded that circumstantial evidence supported the idea that he had been killed.[10] Several leaders of the village, where Rockefeller likely would have arrived had he made it to shore, had been killed by a Dutch patrol in 1958, thus providing some rationale for revenge by the tribe against someone from the "white tribe". Neither cannibalism nor headhunting in Asmat were indiscriminate, but rather were part of an eye-for-an-eye revenge cycle, so it is possible that Rockefeller found himself the victim of such a cycle.[11]